Beccles Flood Risk Management Project Information Page

Closes 1 Sep 2023

Opened 17 Nov 2022

Overview

Welcome to the Beccles Flood Risk Management Project information page.

The Environment Agency have created this page to provide easy access to information on the Beccles project. We will be updating this site as the project progresses, so please keep checking back for new information.

If you would like to be added to our mailing list to receive updates on this project, please email charlotte.lavedrine@environment-agency.gov.uk.

Background

There is a history of flooding from the River Waveney in Beccles. Flooding has historically occurred at  Beccles Quay, Fen Lane, Bridge Street, and at the properties adjacent to the river off Northgate, Puddingmoor and Gillingham Dam. Flooding has been reported in August 1912, 1953, 1968, November 2006, March 2013, December 2013, October 2014 and more recently in December 2020.

We are also aware of surface water flooding issues elsewhere in Beccles. This is being investigated by Suffolk County Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA).

In December 2020 East Anglia received an exceptionally high amount of rainfall, the River Waveney area received 50mm in 18 hours, and a total of 71mm in 96 hours.

Between the 24 and 29 December 2020 flooding occurred in Beccles at The Quay, Fen Lane, Bridge Street and to some of the properties off Northgate, Puddingmoor and Gillingham Dam. 17 properties reported experiencing internal flooding with an additional 10 reports of external flooding.

Flooding occurred from a combination of sources including from the river, surface water run off and through the ground. Heavy rainfall meant the ground was saturated and river levels in the Waveney were high. This affected properties that back onto the river off Northgate and Puddingmoor. The period of flooding was sustained due to the natural tide locking effect of high spring tides on the Broads river system, which prevented the river from draining out to sea. Seepage through the flood boards and walls at Fen Lane occurred, while surface water run off flowing to Fen Lane was also unable to drain away. Water was also reported coming up through the drains on Fen Lane, Bridge Street and at properties off Northgate and Puddingmoor.  Reports of water coming up through the ground and via service ducts were also received.

Broadland Futures Initiative

The Beccles project is being developed alongside the Broadlands Futures Initiative (BFI). This initiative is looking to come up with a strategy for managing flood risk across the Broadland area over the next 100 years from the mid- 2020s. This is being led by the Broads Authority in partnership with the Environment Agency and others. Further information on the BFI and its progress can be found here: https://www.broads-authority.gov.uk/looking-after/climate-change/broadland-futures-initiative

What's happened so far

In 2019 the Environment Agency undertook an “Initial Assessment” of flood risk in Beccles to better understand the risk and consider what could be done to help reduce flood risk. This report came up with a number of potential ways to improve the management of flood risk in Beccles.

 

Following the flooding in December 2020 we have been working with our partners in flood risk management to understand what happened and resolve any immediate issues. We have been working closely with Beccles Town Council, Suffolk County Council, Suffolk Highways, East Suffolk Council and East Suffolk Norse, Anglian Water, the Internal Drainage Board and Suffolk emergency planners. Please refer to the December 2021 Beccles Fact Sheet available at the bottom of this page for more information on this work.

We have also been working with our flood risk consultants, Jacobs, to develop previous work and produce a Strategic Outline Business Case. This will assess a list of options which could help manage flood risk from all sources of flooding in Beccles following the December 2020 event. To inform the project, we have also been undertaking surveys and assessments of the existing defences in Beccles in order to understand their current condition.

We have drawn up a list of possible options to manage flood risk in the area and we are keen to hear your feedback.

Our initial options

The list of options is based on initial findings and is a list of options to consider. We have to ensure any option provides enough benefit (through economic analysis) when compared to the cost of implementing the option.  If the scheme progresses to a more detailed assessment, some options will be ruled out as they will not provide enough benefit to justify the cost.

At this stage it is important that we identify a wide range of options and assess if any are potentially viable to include within the Strategic Outline Business Case.

Beccles benefits from an existing flood defence consisting of brick and concrete walls, wooden flood boards and a flood gate at access points and slipways. These are located at Fen Lane and at the Beccles Lido off Puddingmoor. 

The options below will be used in combination to address all sources of flooding and to create the best option for Beccles. We would like your views on the options listed below and would welcome other ideas or opportunities which you think we need to consider in the business case.

More Information

Replacing the existing timber flood boards with aluminium boards. The existing timber boards require reinforcement with sand bags and wedges and are heavy and difficult to install. Aluminium boards are more water tight and lightweight so they are easier to install. Consideration would need to be given to storage of the aluminium boards and access requirements when boards are locked in place. This option requires someone to install the boards.

More Information

Replacing existing timber flood boards with flood gates. The existing timber boards require reinforcement with sand bags and wedges and are heavy and difficult to install. Flood gates are more water tight and can be opened and closed. This could be particularly beneficial at slipways. Consideration would need to be given to access requirements when gates are closed and the space available. This option requires someone to open and close the gate.

More Information

Replacing existing timber flood boards with a ramp. The existing timber boards require reinforcement with sand bags and wedges and are heavy and difficult to install. Ground levels could be raised to create a ramp at some of the existing access points. This removes the need for someone to install boards and would provide permanent open access. Due to space constraints, a ramp is unlikely to be possible at all access points. This option would need to be considered alongside other options

More Information

The existing timber boards require reinforcement with sand bags and wedges and are heavy and difficult to install. Unused access points could be closed off permanently. This removes the need for someone to install boards. This option would need to be considered alongside other options

More Information

Surface water run off that drains to Fen Lane is controlled by a penstock structure. This structure must be manually operated to ensure surface water can drain to the river and that river water does not flood the surface water system.  Alternative structures could be investigated to remove the need for someone to operate the penstock

More Information

Some of the walls that form part of the existing defence line are known to leak. Where space allows, a new earth embankment or wall could be installed in front of the existing defence. This may be possible in the open space at the quay. Further assessment would be required to confirm the technical viability of this option

More Information

The existing surface water drainage system could be improved by ensuring the system is isolated from the river, and investigating whether capacity and conveyance is adequate. Issues with river water entering the surface water drains has been reported at Fen Lane, Bridge Street, and at properties off Northgate and Puddingmoor. Suffolk Highways and Anglian Water are currently undertaking surveys of the surface water network to investigate this further.

More Information

Sustainable Drainage Solutions also known as SuDS could be installed to manage surface water run off in built up areas of Beccles. SuDS aim to reduce the surface water that enters the drainage system. Some example measures include green roofs, water buts and permeable surfaces. Further investigation will be required to determine which measures are appropriate

More Information

If the existing drainage system is found to require improvement excess surface water could be moved out of low lying areas where it cannot discharge to the river and exceeds the capacity of the surface water drains. The capacity of the existing surface water network is currently being investigated. Careful consideration will need to be given to the impact of this on flood risk elsewhere.

More Information

Offer individual properties products to reduce the likelihood of flood water entering the property. Products include air brick covers, flood doors, non-return valves and pumps. This option will not reduce flooding to the wider area and only reduce the impact of internal flooding to individual properties.

Why your views matter

Get in touch

 At this stage we want to understand the communities views and highlight any opportunities on the options listed above, for us to consider in the business case.

 

Give us your views

We would like to hear you views and feedback on our long list of options. Please take a few minutes to complete our survey by clicking this link Give us your views

Next Steps

Once the survey has closed, comments and feedback on the list of options will be collated to help inform how the options will to be taken forwards for further development. We will continue to share updates on how the project develops.

Contact
If you have questions on the Beccles Flood Risk Management Project please contact us using the email address or phone number at the top of the page.

 

Audiences

  • Recreational and commercial river users
  • Fishing clubs and representative associations
  • Members of the public with an interest in the river, the species and conservation
  • Businesses
  • Charities
  • Statutory organisations
  • NGOs
  • Members of the public
  • Elected representatives, including MPs
  • Local councils
  • Academics
  • All water abstractors
  • Environment Agency customers
  • IDBs
  • Local authorities
  • District and parish councils
  • Environmental bodies
  • Land owners
  • Farming associations
  • Drainage associations
  • RFCCs
  • Elected representatives, including MPs
  • Water companies
  • Members of the public
  • Recreational and commercial river users
  • Community groups
  • Flood action groups
  • Environment Agency colleagues
  • Lead Local Flood Authorities
  • Local Risk Management Authorities
  • Flood Resilience Forums

Interests

  • Flood management
  • Habitats and wildlife